Taylor v. State

122 S.W.3d 718, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 1975, 2003 WL 22952071
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Taylor v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1457
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 16, 2003·No. No. ED 82971·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

A jury found defendant guilty of statutory sodomy and he was sentenced to sixty years’ imprisonment. On direct appeal, this court affirmed. State v. Taylor, 70 S.W.3d 578, 579 (Mo.App. E.D.2002).

Defendant filed a Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. The trial court denied the motion without an evidentiary hearing. Defendant appeals from this judgment. In his sole point on appeal, defendant argues that the court clearly erred in finding that his trial counsel did not have meritorious grounds to object during voir dire to the prosecutor’s definition of reasonable doubt and concluding that counsel’s failure to object did not deprive him of a fair trial. The court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Taylor v. State, 122 S.W.3d 718, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 1975, 2003 WL 22952071 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003).

122 S.W.3d 718 (Taylor v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Taylor
70 S.W.3d 578 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2002)