Taylor v. State
215 S.W.3d 313, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 321, 2007 WL 581655
This text of 215 S.W.3d 313 (Taylor v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Taylor v. State, 215 S.W.3d 313, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 321, 2007 WL 581655 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).
Opinion
ORDER
Mr. Travis W. Taylor appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 24.035 postconviction relief without an evi-dentiary hearing. He asserts that his counsel was ineffective for fading to call his mother as a witness at the sentencing hearing.
For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
215 S.W.3d 313, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 321, 2007 WL 581655, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-state-moctapp-2007.