Taylor v. State

249 S.W.3d 912, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 518, 2008 WL 1722317
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 15, 2008·No. ED 89523·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Little Jimmy Taylor (Appellant) appeals the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.15 1 motion for postconviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude there is no error of law. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

1

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P. 2006, unless otherwise indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Taylor v. State, 249 S.W.3d 912, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 518, 2008 WL 1722317 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

249 S.W.3d 912 (Taylor v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Russell
249 S.W.3d 912 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)