Taylor v. State

739 So. 2d 98, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11514, 1998 WL 597862
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 11, 1998·No. No. 98-1100·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ON MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION

PER CURIAM.

We grant appellant’s motion for certification, and certify to the supreme court the same question we certified in Griffis v. State, 703 So.2d 522 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997), review granted, Case No. 92,160, — So.2d - (Fla.1998):

SHOULD THE HOLDING IN STATE v. GURICAN, 576 So.2d 709 (Fla.1991), BE RE-EVALUATED IN LIGHT OF ORTEGA-RODRIGUEZ v. UNITED STATES, 507 U.S. 234, 113 S.Ct. 1199, 122 L.Ed.2d 581 (1993)?
BARFIELD, C.J., and KAHN and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Taylor v. State, 739 So. 2d 98, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11514, 1998 WL 597862 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

739 So. 2d 98 (Taylor v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Taylor v. State
759 So. 2d 678 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)