Taylor v. State
664 So. 2d 263, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 10953, 1995 WL 608207
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 18, 1995·No. No. 94-4250·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We affirm the order denying appellant’s motion to correct an illegal sentence, pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Our affirmance is without prejudice to appellant’s right to seek post-conviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 8.850. See Davis v. State, 661 So.2d 1193 (Fla.1995); State v. Callaway, 658 So.2d 983 (Fla.1995).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Taylor v. State, 664 So. 2d 263, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 10953, 1995 WL 608207 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).
664 So. 2d 263 (Taylor v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Fresh Del Monte v. Chiquita Intern. Ltd.
664 So. 2d 263 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)