Taylor v. State

610 So. 2d 117, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 13353, 1992 WL 388979
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Taylor v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 557 So. 2d 138
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 31, 1992·No. No. 92-365·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Lawrence Taylor has appealed from conviction arid sentence for aggravated assault, imposed on remand in Taylor v. State, 589 So.2d 997 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991) (Taylor I). Pursuant to Taylor v. State, 608 So.2d 804 (Fla.1992), we vacate the conviction and sentence for aggravated assault.1 The remaining conviction and sentence for armed robbery shall not be affected by this opinion. We do not address the propriety of the consecutive habitual offender minimum mandatory terms imposed on remand in Taylor I, in that our vacation of the conviction and sentence for aggravated assault renders that issue moot.

The conviction and sentence for aggravated assault is reversed, and the case remanded with directions to vacate that conviction and sentence. As noted above, the remaining conviction and sentence for armed robbery shall not be affected by this opinion.

JOANOS, C.J., and SMITH and MINER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Taylor v. State, 610 So. 2d 117, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 13353, 1992 WL 388979 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

610 So. 2d 117 (Taylor v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Taylor v. State
589 So. 2d 997 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Taylor v. State
608 So. 2d 804 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)