Home/Supreme Court of Florida/Taylor v. State

Taylor v. State

595 So. 2d 956, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 205, 1992 Fla. LEXIS 560, 1992 WL 56263
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMarch 26, 1992
DocketNo. 78800
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 595 So. 2d 956 (Taylor v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Taylor v. State, 595 So. 2d 956, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 205, 1992 Fla. LEXIS 560, 1992 WL 56263 (Fla. 1992).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We review Taylor v. State, 586 So.2d 503 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991), in which the district court certified the same question of great public importance as we answered in Williams v. State, 594 So.2d 273 (Fla. 1992).1

In Williams, we held that in the case of multiple violations of probation, sentences may be bumped one cell or guideline range for each violation, but that the court may not depart from the guidelines. Because the trial court in this case departed from the guidelines solely based on Taylor’s multiple violations of probation and community control, we quash the opinion below and remand for resentencing in accordance with Williams.

It is so ordered.

SHAW, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, barkett, grimes, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mullins v. State
622 So. 2d 582 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Bowen v. State
606 So. 2d 1261 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Tucker v. State
595 So. 2d 956 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
595 So. 2d 956, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 205, 1992 Fla. LEXIS 560, 1992 WL 56263, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-state-fla-1992.