Taylor v. State

668 So. 2d 690, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 1744, 1996 WL 82718
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Taylor v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 640 So. 2d 1127
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 28, 1996·No. No. 95-1510·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Reimel v. State, 532 So.2d 16 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988), rev. denied, 542 So.2d 989 (Fla.1989); Bolin v. State, 297 So.2d 317 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974), cert. denied, 304 So.2d [691]*691452 (Fla.1974); Payton v. State, 200 So.2d 255 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Taylor v. State, 668 So. 2d 690, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 1744, 1996 WL 82718 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

668 So. 2d 690 (Taylor v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Reimel v. State
532 So. 2d 16 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Bolin v. State
297 So. 2d 317 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)
Payton v. State
200 So. 2d 255 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1967)