Taylor v. State

670 So. 2d 1136, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3275, 1996 WL 141625
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Taylor v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 640 So. 2d 1127
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 29, 1996·No. No. 94-02850·Published

Opinion

QUINCE, Judge.

Lynwood Taylor challenges his conviction for aggravated battery. We find no merit in his argument that the trial court erred in excluding evidence. We agree, however, that certain conditions of probation must be stricken.

The following special conditions of probation were not orally pronounced at sentencing and are hereby stricken: 1) condition eleven requiring the maintenance of an hourly log; 2) that portion of condition fourteen requiring appellant to pay for testing; 3) condition fifteen requiring appellant to pay $12.00 per year to First Step, Inc.; and 4) that portion of condition eighteen requiring appellant to pay for any evaluation or treatment for problems with alcohol or drugs. See State v. Hart, 668 So.2d 589 (Fla.1996); Roberson v. State, 654 So.2d 1256 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995); Hann v. State, 653 So.2d 404 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995); Luby v. State, 648 So.2d 308 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995); Nunez v. State, 633 So.2d 1146 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994).

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and PATTERSON, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Taylor v. State, 670 So. 2d 1136, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3275, 1996 WL 141625 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

670 So. 2d 1136 (Taylor v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Hart
668 So. 2d 589 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1996)
Luby v. State
648 So. 2d 308 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Nunez v. State
633 So. 2d 1146 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Roberson v. State
654 So. 2d 1256 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Hann v. State
653 So. 2d 404 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)