Taylor v. State

701 So. 2d 1232, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 13371, 1997 WL 741932
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Taylor v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 658 So. 2d 173
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 3, 1997·No. No. 97-1667·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Charles Taylor appeals from a revocation of his community control and probation, and from the sentence imposed following this revocation hearing. We affirm.

Taylor violated the conditions of his community control and probation. It was within the trial court’s discretion to revoke Taylor’s community control and probation when Taylor failed to comply with these conditions, despite his ability to do so. See Hewett v. State, 613 So.2d 1305 (Fla.1993); see also Cardoso v. State, 421 So.2d 589 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Johnson v. State, 667 So.2d 475 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996).

However, this affirmance is without prejudice to Taylor’s right to raise, before the trial court, his claim for time served in state prison.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Taylor v. State, 701 So. 2d 1232, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 13371, 1997 WL 741932 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

701 So. 2d 1232 (Taylor v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hewett v. State
613 So. 2d 1305 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1993)
Johnson v. State
667 So. 2d 475 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Cardoso v. State
421 So. 2d 589 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)