Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Taylor v. State

Taylor v. State

653 So. 2d 1145, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 4877, 1995 WL 258095
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Taylor v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 610 So. 2d 576 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 5, 1995·No. No. 94-2228·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We find no error in the contested issues on appeal. The state properly concedes that conformity with Sirmons v. State, 634 So.2d 153 (Fla.1994) requires appellant’s convictions for grand theft be vacated.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED.

PETERSON, GRIFFIN and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Taylor v. State, 653 So. 2d 1145, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 4877, 1995 WL 258095 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

653 So. 2d 1145 (Taylor v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sirmons v. State
634 So. 2d 153 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1994)