Taylor v. State

655 So. 2d 191, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 5580, 1995 WL 312602
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Taylor v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 610 So. 2d 576
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 24, 1995·No. No. 95-1225·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion for relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Even though the trial court erred in holding the motion was time-barred, a denial was still the correct result, as the motion was otherwise without merit.

POLEN, KLEIN and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Taylor v. State, 655 So. 2d 191, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 5580, 1995 WL 312602 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

655 So. 2d 191 (Taylor v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.