Taylor v. State
700 So. 2d 470, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 11997, 1997 WL 656306
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Taylor v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 658 So. 2d 173 →
Opinion
Because the appellant’s claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel were facially insufficient, we affirm the order by which the trial court denied the appellant’s Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion. We do so without prejudice to the appellant’s right to file a timely, facially sufficient motion. See Purcell v. State, 641 So.2d 514 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); Freeman v. State, 589 So.2d 368 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); Williams v. State, 561 So.2d 1349 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Taylor v. State, 700 So. 2d 470, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 11997, 1997 WL 656306 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).
700 So. 2d 470 (Taylor v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Freeman v. State
589 So. 2d 368 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Williams v. State
561 So. 2d 1349 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Purcell v. State
641 So. 2d 514 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)