Sweeney v. United States

109 U.S. 618, 3 S. Ct. 344, 27 L. Ed. 1053, 1883 U.S. LEXIS 1001
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJanuary 7, 1884
Docket109
StatusPublished
Cited by104 cases

This text of 109 U.S. 618 (Sweeney v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sweeney v. United States, 109 U.S. 618, 3 S. Ct. 344, 27 L. Ed. 1053, 1883 U.S. LEXIS 1001 (1884).

Opinion

Mr. Chief Justice "Waite

delivered the opinion of the court.

This judgment is affirmed on the authority of Kihlberg v. United States, 91 U. S. 398. It was provided in the contract that payment for the wall was not to be made until some officer of the army, civil engineer, or other agent, to-be designated by the United States, had certified, after inspection, “ that it was in all respects as contracted for.” The officer of the army designated under this authority expressly refused to give the necessary certificate, on the ground that neither the material nor the workmanship were such as the contract required. The court below found that there was neither fraud, nor such gross mistake as would necessarily imply bad faith, nor any failure to exercise an honest judgment on the part of the officer in making his inspections. The appellant was notified of the defective character of the material, and that it would not be accepted, before he put it into the wall, and after he had completed his work the wall which he constructed was taken down by order of the quartermaster-general and a new one made of other material built in its place.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Seaboard Lumber Co. v. United States
903 F.2d 1560 (Federal Circuit, 1990)
Sweeney Co. v. Engineers-Constructors, Inc.
823 F.2d 805 (Fourth Circuit, 1987)
Davis Cattle Co., Inc. v. Great Western Sugar Company
393 F. Supp. 1165 (D. Colorado, 1975)
S&E Contractors, Inc. v. United States
406 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1972)
Shepherd v. Gass
488 P.2d 1180 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1971)
Stein Bros. Mfg. Co. v. The United States
337 F.2d 861 (Court of Claims, 1963)
Stein Bros. Mfg. Co. v. United States
337 F.2d 861 (Court of Claims, 1963)
Baez v. Disabled American Veterans Service Foundation
119 F. Supp. 490 (S.D. New York, 1954)
United States v. Wunderlich
342 U.S. 98 (Supreme Court, 1951)
United States v. Moorman
338 U.S. 457 (Supreme Court, 1950)
Zweig v. United States
60 F. Supp. 785 (N.D. Texas, 1945)
United States v. Beuttas
324 U.S. 768 (Supreme Court, 1945)
Highway Const. Co. of Ohio, Inc. v. City of Miami
126 F.2d 777 (Fifth Circuit, 1942)
Callahan Walker Construction Co. v. United States
95 Ct. Cl. 314 (Court of Claims, 1942)
State Highway Department v. MacDougald Construction Co.
6 S.E.2d 570 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1939)
Gillioz v. Webb
99 F.2d 585 (Fifth Circuit, 1938)
Southern New England R. v. Marsch
45 F.2d 766 (First Circuit, 1931)
Friberg v. Elrod
296 P. 1061 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1930)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
109 U.S. 618, 3 S. Ct. 344, 27 L. Ed. 1053, 1883 U.S. LEXIS 1001, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sweeney-v-united-states-scotus-1884.