State v. Williams

62 S.W.3d 97, 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 2084, 2001 WL 1490648
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 27, 2001·No. No. WD 59754·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

Richard Williams appeals his conviction for driving while intoxicated third offense under § 577.010, RSMo 2000. He raises one point that the State improperly commented on his failure to testify. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and find no error of law. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the applicable principles of law would have no prec-edential or jurisprudential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Williams, 62 S.W.3d 97, 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 2084, 2001 WL 1490648 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001).

62 S.W.3d 97 (State v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Williams v. State
111 S.W.3d 556 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2003)