State v. Williams

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Williams

959 S.W.2d 937, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 78, 1998 WL 21732

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 20, 1998

DocketNo. 71773

StatusPublished

This text of 959 S.W.2d 937 (State v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Williams, 959 S.W.2d 937, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 78, 1998 WL 21732 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Anthony Williams (“Defendant”) appeals from judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of stealing property worth more than $150 in violation of Section 570.030, RSMo 1994. He was sentenced to a term of imprisonment of seven years. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Anthony Williams (“Defendant”) appeals from judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of stealing property worth more than $150 in violation of Section 570.030, RSMo 1994. He was sentenced to a term of imprisonment of seven years. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

959 S.W.2d 937, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 78, 1998 WL 21732, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-williams-moctapp-1998.