State v. Williams

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Williams

986 S.W.2d 524, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 200

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 23, 1999

DocketNo. 74380

StatusPublished

This text of 986 S.W.2d 524 (State v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Williams, 986 S.W.2d 524, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 200 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant Tinisha Williams appeals from the judgment entered following her jury conviction for first degree robbery in violation of section 569.020, RSMo 1994. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant Tinisha Williams appeals from the judgment entered following her jury conviction for first degree robbery in violation of section 569.020, RSMo 1994. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

986 S.W.2d 524, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 200, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-williams-moctapp-1999.