State v. Loyd

310 S.W.3d 317, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 706, 2010 WL 2034797
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 25, 2010
DocketWD 70546
StatusPublished

This text of 310 S.W.3d 317 (State v. Loyd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Loyd, 310 S.W.3d 317, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 706, 2010 WL 2034797 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

James Loyd appeals from his conviction after a jury trial of one count of child molestation in the first degree. In his sole point on appeal, he argues that the trial court plainly erred in failing to prevent the State from making reference to, and presenting evidence of, a specific statement he had made to police, when the court had issued a pretrial ruling in limine excluding the statement. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, a memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
310 S.W.3d 317, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 706, 2010 WL 2034797, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-loyd-moctapp-2010.