State v. Loyd
This text of 310 S.W.3d 317 (State v. Loyd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
James Loyd appeals from his conviction after a jury trial of one count of child molestation in the first degree. In his sole point on appeal, he argues that the trial court plainly erred in failing to prevent the State from making reference to, and presenting evidence of, a specific statement he had made to police, when the court had issued a pretrial ruling in limine excluding the statement. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, a memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
310 S.W.3d 317, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 706, 2010 WL 2034797, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-loyd-moctapp-2010.