Nardone v. United States

Supreme Court

Nardone v. United States

308 U.S. 539, 60 S. Ct. 103

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedOctober 9, 1939

DocketNo. 240

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 308 U.S. 539 (Nardone v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nardone v. United States, 308 U.S. 539, 60 S. Ct. 103 (1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit granted, limited to the question whether the trial court correctly disposed of petitioners’ claim that a portion of the respondent’s evidence was procured through the illegal interception of telephone and telegraph messages and the question of the propriety , of a preliminary inquiry to ascertain that fact.

Mr. David V. Cahill for Nardone, and Mr. Louis Halle for Gottfried, petitioners. Solicitor General Jackson, Assistant Attorney General Rogge, and Messrs. George F. Kneip and W. Marvin Smith for the United States. Mr. Justice Reed took no part in the consideration and decision of this application.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit granted, limited to the question whether the trial court correctly disposed of petitioners’ claim that a portion of the respondent’s evidence was procured through the illegal interception of telephone and telegraph messages and the question of the propriety , of a preliminary inquiry to ascertain that fact.

Mr. David V. Cahill for Nardone, and Mr. Louis Halle for Gottfried, petitioners. Solicitor General Jackson, Assistant Attorney General Rogge, and Messrs. George F. Kneip and W. Marvin Smith for the United States. Mr. Justice Reed took no part in the consideration and decision of this application.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

308 U.S. 539, 60 S. Ct. 103, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nardone-v-united-states-scotus-1939.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack