State v. Williams

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Williams

390 S.W.3d 264, 2013 WL 326983, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 110

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 29, 2013

DocketNo. ED 98121

StatusPublished

This text of 390 S.W.3d 264 (State v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Williams, 390 S.W.3d 264, 2013 WL 326983, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 110 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kenneth Williams appeals from the trial court’s judgment, following a jury’s guilty verdict, of trafficking in the second degree, Section 195.223, RSMo 2000. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kenneth Williams appeals from the trial court’s judgment, following a jury’s guilty verdict, of trafficking in the second degree, Section 195.223, RSMo 2000. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

390 S.W.3d 264, 2013 WL 326983, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 110, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-williams-moctapp-2013.