State v. Williams
986 S.W.2d 524, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 200
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Williams. Read the opinion of the Court — 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 616 →
Opinion
ORDER
Defendant Tinisha Williams appeals from the judgment entered following her jury conviction for first degree robbery in violation of section 569.020, RSMo 1994. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Williams, 986 S.W.2d 524, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 200 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999).
986 S.W.2d 524 (State v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.