State v. Williams
936 S.W.2d 178, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 2006, 1996 WL 705838
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Williams. Read the opinion of the Court — 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1846 →
Opinion
ORDER
Defendant appeals from the judgment on his conviction by a jury of forcible sodomy, § 566.060, RSMo 1986, and armed criminal action, § 571.015, RSMo 1994, for which he was sentenced to consecutive twenty year terms of imprisonment.1 We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Williams, 936 S.W.2d 178, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 2006, 1996 WL 705838 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996).
936 S.W.2d 178 (State v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Gaines
807 S.W.2d 678 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1991)