State v. Williams

897 S.W.2d 238, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 898

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Williams. Read the opinion of the Court — 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 89 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 9, 1995·No. Nos. 64038, 65720·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Following a jury trial, defendant Bobby Williams was convicted of one count of burglary in the second degree, § 569.170, R.S.Mo.1986. He received a thirteen-year sentence as a class X offender pursuant to § 558.019, R.S.Mo.1986.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We affirm the judgment in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Defendant also appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for ineffective assistance of trial counsel.

The judgment of the motion court denying defendant’s Rule 29.15 motion is not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no prece-dential value. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We affirm the judgment in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Defendant also appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for ineffective assistance of trial counsel.

State v. Williams, 897 S.W.2d 238, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 898 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

897 S.W.2d 238 (State v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.