State v. Williams

832 S.W.2d 28, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1078, 1992 WL 144962
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Williams. Read the opinion of the Court — 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 5
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 30, 1992·No. No. 60459·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was convicted by a jury of attempted robbery in the second degree and assault in the third degree. He was sentenced by the court as a class X offender to seven years imprisonment on the attempted robbery count. The jury recommended a fine to be set by the court on the assault count; the court set the fine at $100. He appeals; we affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Williams, 832 S.W.2d 28, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1078, 1992 WL 144962 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992).

832 S.W.2d 28 (State v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.