State v. Williams

833 S.W.2d 47, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1205, 1992 WL 174165
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Williams. Read the opinion of the Court — 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 5
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 28, 1992·No. Nos. 59906, 61239·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Carl Williams, appeals from his conviction in the Circuit Court of St. Louis County of stealing over $150.00, RSMo § 570.030 (1986), for which he was sentenced, as a prior and persistent offender, to twelve years’ imprisonment. Appellant also appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. We find no error on the part of the trial court, nor do we find that the motion court’s findings of facts and conclusions of law are clearly erroneous. In addition, we find that no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. This court, therefore, affirms appellant’s conviction pursuant to Rule 30.25(b), and affirms the denial of appellant’s Rule 29.15 motion pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum, solely for the use of the parties involved, has been provided explaining the reasons for our holding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Williams, 833 S.W.2d 47, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1205, 1992 WL 174165 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992).

833 S.W.2d 47 (State v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 570.030
Missouri § 570.030