Home/Missouri Court of Appeals/State v. Williams

State v. Williams

880 S.W.2d 583, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 997, 1994 WL 270462
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Williams. Read the opinion of the Court — 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 229 →
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 21, 1994·No. Nos. 62441, 64232·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals after a jury convicted him of unlawful possession of a coneealable [584]*584firearm and the motion court subsequently denied his motion for posteonviction relief. We find the findings of fact issued by the motion court are not clearly erroneous and no error of law appears. Rule 84.16(b). Further, we find no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion and affirm by a written summary order. Rule 30.25(b). A memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision has been issued to the parties for their use only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Williams, 880 S.W.2d 583, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 997, 1994 WL 270462 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

880 S.W.2d 583 (State v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.