State v. Williams

928 S.W.2d 15, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1501, 1996 WL 495068
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Williams. Read the opinion of the Court — 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1602
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 3, 1996·No. No. 68774·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

In this jury-tried case, Defendant appeals his conviction for second-degree burglary, § 669.170, RSMo 1994. The trial court sentenced him as a prior, persistent, and class X offender to fifteen years’ imprisonment. Defendant alleges the trial court plainly erred when it allowed the State to argue the evidence against him was uncontradicted. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 80.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Williams, 928 S.W.2d 15, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1501, 1996 WL 495068 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996).

928 S.W.2d 15 (State v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.