State v. Williams

41 S.W.3d 555, 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 211, 2001 WL 95830
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Williams. Read the opinion of the Court — 24 S.W.3d 101
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 6, 2001·No. No. ED 77471·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mareellus Williams (“Defendant”) appeals the judgment entered upon his conviction for first-degree robbery, Section 569.020 RSMo. (1994);1 armed criminal action, Section 571.015; and unlawful use of a weapon, Section 571.030.1 RSMo. Supp. (1999). Defendant was sentenced to concurrent terms of twenty years for the first-degree robbery, twenty years for armed criminal action, and seven years for unlawful use of a weapon. Defendant alleges that: (1) the trial court plainly erred in finding him a persistent felony offender under Section 558.016; and (2) the trial court erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that: (1) Defendant suffered no manifest injustice or miscarriage of justice in being sentenced as a persistent offender; and (2) there was sufficient evidence to show that Defendant was carrying a concealed weapon. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Williams, 41 S.W.3d 555, 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 211, 2001 WL 95830 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001).

41 S.W.3d 555 (State v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.