State v. Williams

976 S.W.2d 600, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 1635, 1998 WL 611051
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Williams. Read the opinion of the Court — 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 616
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 15, 1998·No. No. 73551·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant Terrell Williams appeals the judgment entered upon his conviction by a jury of second degree murder, in violation of section 565.021.1(2) RSMo 1994, and armed criminal action, in violation of section 571.015 RSMo 1994. Defendant contends that the trial court erred in overruling defense counsel’s objection to the rebuttal testimony of the prosecutor’s investigator in that the testi[601]*601mony was inadmissible under Supreme Court Rule 24.02(d)(5). As defendant failed to include this error in his motion for new trial, review is for plain error.

We have examined the briefs and the record on appeal and find no manifest injustice. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would serve no precedential or jurisprudential value. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Williams, 976 S.W.2d 600, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 1635, 1998 WL 611051 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998).

976 S.W.2d 600 (State v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.