State v. Rogers
Opinion
ORDER
Lou A. Rogers appeals the judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of kidnapping. 1 We find that there was sufficient evidence to support his conviction.
An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).
. The jury also found Rogers guilty of two counts of armed criminal action and one count of attempted robbery in the first degree; however, he does not challenge the judgment entered on those convictions on appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
303 S.W.3d 630 (State v. Rogers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.