State v. Rogers

303 S.W.3d 630, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 857, 2010 WL 623633
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 23, 2010·No. ED 92219·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Lou A. Rogers appeals the judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of kidnapping. 1 We find that there was sufficient evidence to support his conviction.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

1

. The jury also found Rogers guilty of two counts of armed criminal action and one count of attempted robbery in the first degree; however, he does not challenge the judgment entered on those convictions on appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Rogers, 303 S.W.3d 630, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 857, 2010 WL 623633 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

303 S.W.3d 630 (State v. Rogers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Turner
303 S.W.3d 630 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)