State v. Rogers

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Rogers

367 S.W.3d 679, 2012 WL 2107921, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 783

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Rogers. Read the opinion of the Court — 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 857 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 12, 2012·No. No. ED 96564·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Lavaris Rogers appeals the judgment entered upon a jury’s verdict convicting him of seven counts of first-degree robbery and seven counts of armed criminal action. We find the trial court did not err in overruling Rogers’ motion to suppress the -witnesses’ identifications of him. We affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Lavaris Rogers appeals the judgment entered upon a jury’s verdict convicting him of seven counts of first-degree robbery and seven counts of armed criminal action. We find the trial court did not err in overruling Rogers’ motion to suppress the -witnesses’ identifications of him. We affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Rogers, 367 S.W.3d 679, 2012 WL 2107921, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 783 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

367 S.W.3d 679 (State v. Rogers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.