State v. Rogers

377 S.W.3d 648, 2012 WL 4355491, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1197
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Rogers. Read the opinion of the Court — 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 857
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 25, 2012·No. No. WD 74110·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Ronnie Ray Rogers appeals the trial court’s denial of his motions for judgment of acquittal at the close of all the evidence and entry of judgment on the verdict of guilty for two counts of the offense of second degree statutory sodomy. In his two points on appeal, Rogers claims that the evidence was insufficient to establish the “deviate sexual intercourse” element of the crime because for Counts II and III the State did not clarify Victim’s account as he argues was required by the jury instructions submitted by the State. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Rogers, 377 S.W.3d 648, 2012 WL 4355491, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1197 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

377 S.W.3d 648 (State v. Rogers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.