State v. Rogers
This text of 247 S.W.3d 605 (State v. Rogers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Darrell M. Rogers appeals the judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of forcible rape, forcible sodomy, first degree burglary, first degree robbery, and three counts of armed criminal action. We find that there is sufficient evidence showing Rogers’s participation in the crimes with which he was convicted. We also find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting evidence regarding Rogers’s accomplice.
An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
247 S.W.3d 605, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 339, 2008 WL 708520, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-rogers-moctapp-2008.