State v. Ralls
252 S.W.3d 243, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 653, 2008 WL 2019466
Opinion
ORDER
Bilah K. Ralls (hereinafter “Ralls”) appeals his conviction for possession of a controlled substance in violation of section 195.202, RSMo 2000. In his sole point on appeal he seeks plain error review of the court’s decision to send to the jury room during deliberations a baggie of crack cocaine contained within an evidence bag even though both bags had been admitted into evidence. We decline to exercise plain error review. The argument falls below the level of frivolousness and we affirm the conviction pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Ralls, 252 S.W.3d 243, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 653, 2008 WL 2019466 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).
252 S.W.3d 243 (State v. Ralls) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Rogers
252 S.W.3d 243 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)