State v. Rogers

247 S.W.3d 605, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 339, 2008 WL 708520
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 18, 2008·No. ED 89606·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Darrell M. Rogers appeals the judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of forcible rape, forcible sodomy, first degree burglary, first degree robbery, and three counts of armed criminal action. We find that there is sufficient evidence showing Rogers’s participation in the crimes with which he was convicted. We also find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting evidence regarding Rogers’s accomplice.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Rogers, 247 S.W.3d 605, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 339, 2008 WL 708520 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

247 S.W.3d 605 (State v. Rogers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Jackson
247 S.W.3d 605 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)