State v. Robinson
This text of 258 S.W.3d 849 (State v. Robinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Kenneth Robinson appeals the judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of two counts of forcible sodomy, one count of forcible rape, and one count of kidnapping. We find that the trial court did not err in admitting and excluding witnesses’ testimony. We also find that there is sufficient evidence to support Robinson’s convictions.
An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
258 S.W.3d 849, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 701, 2008 WL 2098047, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-robinson-moctapp-2008.