State v. Robinson

184 S.W.3d 137, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 163, 2006 WL 328166
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Robinson. Read the opinion of the Court — 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 931
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 14, 2006·No. No. ED 86057·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Terrell D. Robinson (Appellant) appeals from a trial court judgment granting the State’s Motion for Order Nunc Pro Tunc to correct a clerical mistake in the typewritten Judgment and Sentence. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court had jurisdiction to grant and did not abuse its discretion in granting the State’s Motion for Order Nunc Pro Tunc. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Robinson, 184 S.W.3d 137, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 163, 2006 WL 328166 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

184 S.W.3d 137 (State v. Robinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.