State v. Robinson
This text of 181 S.W.3d 608 (State v. Robinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Defendant, Ronald Robinson, appeals from the judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of robbery in the first degree and attempted robbery in the first degree. On appeal, defendant argues that the victims’ identifications of him were the result of impermissibly suggestive police [609]*609procedures and this rendered the victims’ identifications unreliable.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
181 S.W.3d 608, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 33, 2006 WL 44331, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-robinson-moctapp-2006.