Snelling v. BLECKMAN

258 S.W.3d 849, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 706, 2008 WL 2098063
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 20, 2008·No. ED 90260·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Lonnie Snelling appeals the trial court’s order denying his motion to file a third amended petition and the trial court’s judgment dismissing his second *850 amended petition for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. We find that the order denying Snelling’s motion to file a third amended complaint was not a final, appealable judgment under Rule 74.01, 1 and therefore we have no jurisdiction to review the order on appeal. Nevertheless, we find that the judgment dismissing Snelling’s second amended petition, which disposed of all claims against all parties, was a final judgment and was not in error. All motions taken with the case are hereby overruled. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).

1

. All references to "Rule” are to Missouri Supreme Court Rules (2008).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Snelling v. BLECKMAN, 258 S.W.3d 849, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 706, 2008 WL 2098063 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

258 S.W.3d 849 (Snelling v. BLECKMAN) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Robinson
258 S.W.3d 849 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)