State v. Robinson

216 S.W.3d 179, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 196, 2007 WL 330005
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Robinson. Read the opinion of the Court — 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 656
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 6, 2007·No. No. ED 87658·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Curtis Robinson (“Defendant”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered upon his convictions for kidnapping, robbery in the first degree, four counts of sodomy, and six counts of armed criminal action. Defendant raises three points on appeal: (1) the trial court erred in accepting the jury’s guilty verdict on Count 9, forcible sodomy, and Count 10, armed criminal action (2) the trial court erred in giving Instruction 16; and (3) the trial court erred when it overruled Defendant’s challenges to the State’s use of two of its peremptory strikes to remove two African-American venirepersons. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the motion court’s decision was not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the award pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Robinson, 216 S.W.3d 179, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 196, 2007 WL 330005 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

216 S.W.3d 179 (State v. Robinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.