State v. Roberts

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Roberts

335 S.W.3d 575, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 326, 2011 WL 899640

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Roberts. Read the opinion of the Court — 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1546 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 15, 2011·No. ED 93916·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Chris Roberts appeals from the judgment of the trial court entered after a jury convicted him of murder in the second degree and armed criminal action. Finding no error, we affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. *576 However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 80.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Chris Roberts appeals from the judgment of the trial court entered after a jury convicted him of murder in the second degree and armed criminal action. Finding no error, we affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. *576 However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 80.25(b).

State v. Roberts, 335 S.W.3d 575, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 326, 2011 WL 899640 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

335 S.W.3d 575 (State v. Roberts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.