State v. Roberts

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Roberts

242 S.W.3d 479, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 29, 2008 WL 126577

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 15, 2008

DocketWD 65407

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 242 S.W.3d 479 (State v. Roberts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Roberts, 242 S.W.3d 479, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 29, 2008 WL 126577 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Vermonn T. Roberts appeals her conviction, after a jury trial, for second-degree murder, Section 565.021 RSMo (2000), and armed criminal action, Section 571.015 RSMo (2000). Roberts claims that the trial court erred in failing to, sua sponte, restrain the prosecutor from making a misstatement of law during closing argument. She also claims the verdict directing instruction for second-degree murder was in error. Both points on appeal are reviewed under plain error. Judgment affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Vermonn T. Roberts appeals her conviction, after a jury trial, for second-degree murder, Section 565.021 RSMo (2000), and armed criminal action, Section 571.015 RSMo (2000). Roberts claims that the trial court erred in failing to, sua sponte, restrain the prosecutor from making a misstatement of law during closing argument. She also claims the verdict directing instruction for second-degree murder was in error. Both points on appeal are reviewed under plain error. Judgment affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

242 S.W.3d 479, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 29, 2008 WL 126577, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-roberts-moctapp-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack