State v. Roberts

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Roberts

393 S.W.3d 154, 2013 WL 968170, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 299

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 12, 2013

DocketNo. ED 97508

StatusPublished

This text of 393 S.W.3d 154 (State v. Roberts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Roberts, 393 S.W.3d 154, 2013 WL 968170, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 299 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Joey Roberts (“Roberts”), appeals from the judgment entered upon a jury verdict of first-degree assault, Section 565.050,¹ and armed criminal action, Section 571.015. Roberts was convicted of stabbing Elbert Asher (“Asher”) multiple times in the head and back. During trial, at the jury instruction conference, the trial court denied Roberts’s request that the jury be instructed on self-defense. The trial court subsequently denied Roberts’s untimely filed motion for a new trial on the ground that the trial court erred in failing to offer the self-defense instruction. On appeal, Roberts argues that the trial court plainly erred in declining to instruct the jury on self-defense, and, as a result, his convictions of first-degree assault and the corresponding charge of armed criminal action should be overturned.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Mo. R.Crim. P. 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Joey Roberts (“Roberts”), appeals from the judgment entered upon a jury verdict of first-degree assault, Section 565.050,¹ and armed criminal action, Section 571.015. Roberts was convicted of stabbing Elbert Asher (“Asher”) multiple times in the head and back. During trial, at the jury instruction conference, the trial court denied Roberts’s request that the jury be instructed on self-defense. The trial court subsequently denied Roberts’s untimely filed motion for a new trial on the ground that the trial court erred in failing to offer the self-defense instruction. On appeal, Roberts argues that the trial court plainly erred in declining to instruct the jury on self-defense, and, as a result, his convictions of first-degree assault and the corresponding charge of armed criminal action should be overturned.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Mo. R.Crim. P. 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

393 S.W.3d 154, 2013 WL 968170, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 299, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-roberts-moctapp-2013.