State v. Roberts

423 S.W.3d 799, 2013 WL 5634589, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1188
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Roberts. Read the opinion of the Court — 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1546
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 15, 2013·No. No. ED 98907·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Bobby Joe Roberts appeals the judgment entered upon a jury verdict convict[800]*800ing him of one count of forcible rape and two counts of forcible sodomy. We find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting a portion of the victim’s mother’s testimony and that the admission of her testimony was not prejudicial to Roberts. We also find that the trial court did not err in failing to intervene sua sponte and declare a mistrial during a portion of the prosecutor’s closing argument. Finally, we find that the trial court did not commit instructional error.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Roberts, 423 S.W.3d 799, 2013 WL 5634589, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1188 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

423 S.W.3d 799 (State v. Roberts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.