State v. Roberts

305 S.W.3d 496, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 251, 2010 WL 711394
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 2, 2010·No. ED 92184·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

A jury convicted the appellant, Christopher Roberts, of two counts of possession of a controlled substance pursuant to section 195.202 RSMo (2000) 1 . The trial court sentenced him to 12 years of imprisonment. He now appeals.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

1

. All statutory references are to RSMo (2000), unless otherwise indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Roberts, 305 S.W.3d 496, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 251, 2010 WL 711394 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

305 S.W.3d 496 (State v. Roberts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Beasley v. State
305 S.W.3d 496 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)