State v. Roberts

305 S.W.3d 496, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 251, 2010 WL 711394
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 2, 2010
DocketED 92184
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 305 S.W.3d 496 (State v. Roberts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Roberts, 305 S.W.3d 496, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 251, 2010 WL 711394 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

A jury convicted the appellant, Christopher Roberts, of two counts of possession of a controlled substance pursuant to section 195.202 RSMo (2000) 1 . The trial court sentenced him to 12 years of imprisonment. He now appeals.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

1

. All statutory references are to RSMo (2000), unless otherwise indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Beasley v. State
305 S.W.3d 496 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
305 S.W.3d 496, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 251, 2010 WL 711394, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-roberts-moctapp-2010.