State v. Roberts

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Roberts

223 S.W.3d 221, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 816, 2007 WL 1575009

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Roberts. Read the opinion of the Court — 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 29 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 29, 2007·No. WD 66712·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Ronald Louis Roberts appeals his conviction for driving a motor vehicle while his driver’s license was suspended, pursuant to Section 302.321. Roberts raises two points of error: (1) the information failed to allege a culpable mental state; and (2) the State failed to prove a culpable mental state, an essential element of the crime charged. This court, having reviewed the record, determines that the information was not defective and the evidence before the court was sufficient to find Roberts criminally negligent pursuant to Section 302.321. Judgment affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Ronald Louis Roberts appeals his conviction for driving a motor vehicle while his driver’s license was suspended, pursuant to Section 302.321. Roberts raises two points of error: (1) the information failed to allege a culpable mental state; and (2) the State failed to prove a culpable mental state, an essential element of the crime charged. This court, having reviewed the record, determines that the information was not defective and the evidence before the court was sufficient to find Roberts criminally negligent pursuant to Section 302.321. Judgment affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Roberts, 223 S.W.3d 221, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 816, 2007 WL 1575009 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

223 S.W.3d 221 (State v. Roberts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.