Beasley v. State
305 S.W.3d 496, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 252, 2010 WL 711398
Opinion
ORDER
Movant, Terrell Beasley, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. We affirm the judgment in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Beasley v. State, 305 S.W.3d 496, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 252, 2010 WL 711398 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).
305 S.W.3d 496 (Beasley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Roberts
305 S.W.3d 496 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)