State v. Randle

827 So. 2d 665, 2002 La.App. 3 Cir. 309, 2002 La. App. LEXIS 4243, 2002 WL 31215124
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedOctober 2, 2002
DocketNos. CR02-309, CR02-310
StatusPublished

This text of 827 So. 2d 665 (State v. Randle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Randle, 827 So. 2d 665, 2002 La.App. 3 Cir. 309, 2002 La. App. LEXIS 4243, 2002 WL 31215124 (La. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

WOODARD, Judge.

For the reasons found in State v. Randle, CR02-309 (La.App. 3 Cir. 10/02/02), 827 So.2d 657, we vacate Mr. Randle’s sentences as indeterminate and remand the case for resentencing.

SENTENCES VACATED, CONVICTION AFFIRMED, AND REMANDED [666]*666FOR RESENTENCING WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Randle
827 So. 2d 657 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
827 So. 2d 665, 2002 La.App. 3 Cir. 309, 2002 La. App. LEXIS 4243, 2002 WL 31215124, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-randle-lactapp-2002.