State v. Davis

365 S.W.3d 617, 2012 WL 1416645, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 545
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 24, 2012·No. ED 96637·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Daryl Davis (“Defendant”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment and sentence after a jury convicted him of three counts of forcible rape, pursuant to Section 566.030 RSMo 1986. Defendant argues the trial court erred by improperly joining offenses and subsequently refusing to sever them, wrongfully admitting DNA evidence, and overruling his objection during the State’s closing argument. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Davis, 365 S.W.3d 617, 2012 WL 1416645, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 545 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

365 S.W.3d 617 (State v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Daryl Davis, Movant/Appellant v. State of Missouri
453 S.W.3d 882 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2015)