State v. Davis
This text of 278 S.W.3d 227 (State v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Anthony Davis appeals from his convictions for second-degree murder, first-de *228 gree robbery, and two counts of armed criminal action. He argues that the circuit court clearly erred in denying his objection to the State’s use of three peremptory strikes to exclude black jurors in his second jury trial. After a thorough review of the record, we find that the trial court’s ruling on the Batson challenge was not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value, but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.
Judgment affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
278 S.W.3d 227, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 324, 2009 WL 668703, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-davis-moctapp-2009.